Can Farmers Have A Voice?

Last year I became a member of the Pennsylvania Farm Bureau (PFB) in an effort to learn about the organization and become involved with the state (and country) wide food production discussion. Since jumping into the Farm Bureau head first I have learned more than I imagined was possible, met some great people, enhanced my agricultural knowledge, and had some awesome experiences to tell the story of food production. I am proud to be a part of such an extensive organization and I look to the future with eager anticipation.

A major aspect of Farm Bureau is working with legislatures and various government organizations to ensure that unreasonable laws and regulations are not put in place that will choke Pennsylvania's grain and livestock farmers out of business (one of my primary motivations for joining was to become involved in this segment of the Bureau). The 50,000+ Pa Farm Bureau members provide the voice to guide discussions and the numbers to maintain a fair amount of political clout in Harrisburg and Washington, something vital to avoid being overlooked and overrun. Such an outstanding amount of membership support for the PFB has helped keep the playing field level to ensure that farmers carry a fair share of various regulations and do not end up with a heavier burden than other Pennsylvania industries.

Something that has surprised me, however, is how fiercely opposing organizations attack us, the farmers, for joining and contributing to the organization. The moment any political issue arises that the Farm Bureau is involved with, the media is flooded with comments from outraged environmentalists, animal rights activists, etc, screaming about how awful it is that 'Big Agribusiness' and the associated 'Factory Farms' use their oppressive political power to cover up all of the harm done by the food production industry.

Why is it OK for opposing organizations to rally hundreds of thousands - or even millions - of misinformed people in an attempt to punch their agenda into modern society, but completely outrageous if the farm community comes together in an attempt to counter their attacks? An individual once told me that mainstream society does not like to see the farmer succeed; although I did not want to accept the idea, I have found it to be quite true. If, Heaven forbid, we manage to turn a profit in a year, we are accused of ignoring animal well being and destroying the quality of our land in pursuit of the almighty dollar. If we do not tout ourselves as a trendy organic farm, we are accused of poisoning consumers without giving food safety a second thought. If we combine efforts to counter stringent regulations (that provide third party organizations the right to require overwhelmingly expensive overhauls to existing farms, with a $30,000 per-day penalty for not meeting the requirements), suddenly we become factory farmers who care little for the world around us. Interesting.

Believe it or not, farmers - both big and small, production and niche, livestock and crops - are people just others in mainstream society; our business just happens to be agriculture. We, also, love the land and do not want to destroy it. We, also, appreciate our animals and want to give them healthy, dignified lives. We, also, breath the air and do not want to contaminate it. We, also, feed our families with food from the grocery store and do not wish to be sickened by it. In other words, our goals are the same as those of the organizations rising up to oppose us. We are working towards the same cause, but the farm community needs a fair voice in order to balance out the equation and ensure regulations and associated time lines can be reasonably attained. Certain environmental groups would do well to realize that reality before lashing out against us.